Lay Top Trumps on table

September 15, 2011

I may be the last person you would expect to rally to the defence of David Willetts, but if his recent comments on differential tariffs for A levels are interpreted in a certain way, they open a necessary debate and have been unfairly dismissed by Mary Curnock Cook, chief executive of the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service ("Ucas head vetoes A-level bonuses", 25 August).

Like many, I dislike the idea of playing Top Trumps with subjects, but I dislike even more the prospect of young people falling between the gaps because they have not been given the facts.

I must make it clear at this point that I have little time for the suggestion that different subjects have different intrinsic value: this is not only problematically subjective but also unhelpful for those students who have recently received their results. If Willetts meant to support that suggestion, the critics were right to go on the offensive.

However, I suspect that the minister was drawing attention to an unconfirmed but widely rumoured practice - that universities do give different weightings to different subjects. If this were indeed his intention, he is right to encourage debate.

It may be true that unbeknown to students their choice of A-level subjects does restrict their options further down the line. As a result, they may pick the wrong subjects and be unable to get into the university or course that is right for them. Bureaucracy should not stop us being honest with young people and Willetts was right to raise this important issue. If, as I have suggested, there is a kernel of truth in what he says, to ignore his comments would be to let students down.

Liam Burns, National president, National Union of Students

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan