Labour's next big idea?

July 7, 2011

After the political mire of New Labour, Simon Szreter's piece offers a welcome escape route for the party ("Universal access", 22 June).

Szreter's timely anchoring of his argument on the dismissal of R.H. Tawney's proposal for universal secondary education by the financial and political Establishment of the 1920s shows that nothing changes in that quarter. Yet apart from the natural injustice of allocating educational resources according to class-based privilege, the case for universalism is in large part economic. If we fail to invest in the means of renewing capability and democratic citizenship to match the demands of the 21st century, we will continue to proceed down the slippery slope of economic decline.

For a Labour Party looking urgently for the means to be both radical and relevant, the big idea of universal higher education is obvious.

John Bynner, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Capsized woman and boat

Early career academics can be left to sink or swim when navigating the choppy waters of learning scholarly writing. Helen Sword says a more formal, communal approach can help everyone, especially women

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan