KTP cut will harm economy

February 24, 2011

The Association for University Research and Industry Links, the largest knowledge-transfer practitioner-based association in Europe, is extremely concerned about the planned reduction in knowledge-transfer partnerships and their revised focus.

The changes proposed by the Technology Strategy Board will have a detrimental effect on embedding innovation within business, will harm university-industry relations and undermine the innovation potential of many small and medium-sized enterprises.

By focusing on its priority areas, the board will in effect make many smaller firms ineligible for its knowledge-transfer partnership support programme. That will affect local economies and jobs, especially in regions without large research and development-intensive businesses.

In addition, the higher entry point for companies - full knowledge-transfer partnerships or nothing - will hit those wanting to engage with the academy on a modest, low-cost, low-risk scale. The creative industries are likely to be hit hardest, and they add more to the UK economy than manufacturing (about £6.5 billion a year).

According to the government's KTP Annual Report 2008/09, for every £1 million of state investment in knowledge-transfer partnerships, there is a profit of £3.6 million before tax and 32 jobs created. KTPs offer excellent value for money and pay for themselves very quickly. They are vital to graduate retention and employment and add value.

Knowledge-transfer partnerships are a proven route for businesses to access universities' research, innovation and skills. Reducing their number will impede innovation and growth, just when they are needed most.

Innovation; economic and social impact; business engagement; employment; regional growth agenda; and value for money - are we missing the point somewhere?

Philip Graham, Executive director for Auril, the Association for University Research and Industry Links

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns