Incompetent boards

October 31, 2003

If the government introduces baccalaureate-style diplomas, let's hope it investigates A-level boards ("Bac may force change to degrees", THES , October 24). Universities have to deal not only with the boards'

proven incompetence but also with the probability that many unchallenged results are incorrect.

In 1999, my eldest daughter asked for her English paper to be re-marked. But the AQA board had lost it and so she had to accept the initial result. My second child, after a car accident the night before her religious studies A level, mistakenly turned up in the afternoon for the morning examination. Though assured the accident would be taken into account, the outcome was a mark of 0. When my third child sat A levels, a mark of 0 listed against an English literature paper alerted us to the probability of error, leading to a regrade to A (by which time his first-choice university had rejected him). But he got no explanation or apology.

A-level boards accept no responsibility for their errors, suffer no consequences and feel no need to apologise. How can we have confidence that the criteria we use for university admissions allow us to admit the right candidates?

Janette Dillon
Professor of drama
University of Nottingham

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns