High interest statement

December 19, 2013

In his Autumn Statement, Chancellor George Osborne said: “So today I can announce that next year we will provide 30,000 more student places – and the year after we will abolish the cap on student numbers altogether…The new loans will be financed by selling the old student loan book.” (News, 5 December.)

On 25 November, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills announced the sale of the final tranche of the pre-1998 student loan book for just £160 million. Its face value is £890 million. This is a disastrous return for the public purse.

The National Audit Office published a report three days later, which estimates that the student loan book will be worth £200 billion by 2043 in today’s prices. This was published before the Autumn Statement, so with unrestricted student numbers the watchdog’s estimate could be too low.

How can Osborne raise sufficient money to fund additional student loans under current rules when £890 million of the loan book is only worth £160 million on the open market? He cannot.

The Autumn Statement paves the way for the abolition of subsidised interest rates on student loans. Only by removing this subsidy can the loan book be made sufficiently attractive to the private sector. And if such a change were brought in, it would surely affect everyone – even current borrowers.

Name and address supplied

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham