It was with some surprise that I read a letter from two former employees of Luton University in The Times Higher last week (November 26). Their comments are strange, not least because the changes to assessment to which they refer took place in the mid-1990s, long before my appointment in 2003, and yet they include a personal attack on my memory.
The comments are also inaccurate, as the changes did not affect our pass-fail boundary. Our criteria are firmly rooted in national advice from the relevant bodies and our external examiners have not questioned them.
We are top among the new universities for the quality of our teaching. At no time have I - or would I - allow standards to be compromised. The whole tenor of this ongoing debate in The Times Higher is on failure. Surely the debate should be about how we support students to succeed?
Vice-chancellor, Luton University
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now