Handmaiden’s tale

October 17, 2013

Your review of Helen Small’s The Value of the Humanities summarises the five main arguments made in support of the discipline (“Calm voice lauds humanities’ part in public conversation”, News, 26 September). One is that it plays “a gadfly function in democracy”. There is also a sixth.

At my small liberal arts university, a presidential search is under way. In its notice to potential candidates, the headhunting firm notes the university’s foundation in the arts and sciences, recognises growing strengths in the “professional disciplines” and points out that such disciplines “draw on” the arts. Indeed, “the humanities and social sciences…are well integrated and synergistic with professional programs, offering courses in ethical practice, contemporary issues, and geopolitical contexts”. More handmaiden than gadfly now, it seems.

John Edwards
Antigonish, Nova Scotia

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham