Hacks hold the reins

February 21, 2003

Tom Hickey asked "why didn't we say no" to the degradation of academia (Soapbox, THES , January 24)? It is true that the state has forced much of this on academia, but it could hardly have done so without its willing complicity. I suggest some reasons:

* If there exist only the alternatives of "learning for its own sake" and learning as utility, then the utilitarian end will win as it is more "realistic" and socially useful

* Far from affirming its role as truth-pursuer, academia has surrendered to the Faustian temptation of seeking knowledge as power, and through this to make common cause with the state as power-source, putting itself in thrall to the state

* Academia tends to be statist rather than libertarian in outlook (as Hickey's remarks on Adam Smith reveal) and therefore hostile to individual or private efforts, while fostering collectivity

* Academic habits of thinking frequently become utilitarian and assume a virtue in aggregating information and skill at mediocre levels, rather than pursuing high knowledge and insight

* So academia stultifies itself and derides the cultivation of rare talent as "elitism" and pure research as "snobbery"

* Education is bureaucratised, and this, despite complaints, is by no means unpalatable to the natural apparatchiks

* So academia becomes part of "the real world" and tries to model itself on the motivations and procedures of business and industry

* There is perennial tension in academia between the originals and the hacks: all of the foregoing favours the hacks.

Nigel Probert
Porthmadog

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns