Paul Wellings argues that having a small number of elite universities specialising in postgraduate research would be more efficient and more beneficial for the research student experience.
But this one-model-fits-everything approach has some drawbacks. The large postgraduate school can sometimes function as a PhD production line, and there are other kinds of research community that give students a better experience.
Wellings says these schools should run alongside technology-transfer offices that will draw out new intellectual property. This suggests not only wiping out a whole range of thriving research environments that lie outside these centres, but also a whole range of excellent research that does not generate technology-based intellectual property.
This is a slash-and-burn vision where everything is invested in a "cash crop" that will sell in the "knowledge economy". It is a vision that should be rejected by all who have an interest in UK research beyond the technology/business model, in favour of an approach that encourages variation, experimentation and originality across the whole range of possibilities.
Phil Cole, University of Wales, Newport.
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Sign in now