Daniel Swift's review of Malise Ruthven's Fundamentalism implies, perhaps inadvertently, that Christian fundamentalism is homogeneous and that it leads to religious violence (Books, February 18).
Yet, the movements Swift singles out, "Mormonism, Seventh Day (sic) Adventism and the Jehovah's Witnesses", are seen as dubious by mainstream North American Christian fundamentalist denominations, which in turn are regarded with suspicion by Orthodox believers - the chief Christian fundamentalists in Europe.
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-Day Adventists endorse pacifism; and while US fundamentalist politicians' "celebration of the state often shades into religious polemic", US Seventh-Day Adventists, because of their "fundamentalist" reading of the Bible, generally reject such leaders.
Ignoring the heterogeneity of Christian fundamentalism and demonising it are unhelpful responses to religious violence.
David Trim Newbold College, Bracknell
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now