Figures of speech

June 7, 2002

Many statistics quoted by senior public figures on the proportion of students receiving local education authority support for tuition fees are based on estimates rather than on actual figures. We believe the proportion of students is much smaller than the 50 per cent claimed for 2001-02.

We conducted research using the Department for Education and Skills statistical first-release for April 2002 that sets out the distribution of fee support for 2000-01. But these figures are based on students assessed by their LEA and do not include those who did not apply for assessment and paid tuition fees in full. To determine the size of this "hidden" contingent, we compared the number of students in DFES figures with Higher Education Statistics Agency figures on the number of full-time home undergraduates for 2000-01. This revealed a shortfall of 117,805.

Revising the total number of students, we found that 35 per cent did not pay tuition fees in 2000-01, 49 per cent paid in full and therefore 65 per cent made a contribution. Figures for 2001-02 from the Student Loans Company show that only 35 per cent were assessed for full LEA support and 48 per cent were assessed for zero support. This is a decrease in the proportion who obtained full support in 2001-02. Again, these figures exclude students who did not apply to be assessed.

The differences between these two sets of figures and the differences between our findings and the statistics quoted publicly raise serious questions.

Anna Edwards
Education officer
General Council of the Bar

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns