The front-page headline "Mary Warnock looks for God in a racy text" with a stained-glass image of the patriarch himself, inappropriately signalled your religious studies book reviews (THES, December 13).
The section was appropriated by liberal Christian theology and church-history agendas. Only one reviewer, Robert Segal, is a religious-studies academic. Of seven books reviewed, only David Gosling's was representative of the interdisciplinarity of religious studies. The concerns of authors and reviewers are overwhelmingly confessional, pastoral and theological. The impression given was that "religion" is an unproblematic compound of personal piety, theological reflection and ecclesiastical history, regulated and interpreted overwhelmingly by men. The contested cultural and political realities of religion in today's world vanished. Where were the ethnographical, sociological, gender, postcolonial and multiculturalist authors and reviewers who represent the cutting edge of contemporary religious studies debates?
Religious studies department
University of Stirling
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now