Ethical scrutiny

September 8, 2006

Your report of the restrictions on covert social science research ("Ethics guards are 'stifling' creativity", August 25) may fuel an overreaction to the concern for improving ethical scrutiny. I too have had a covert research proposal rejected by an ethics committee since, in its view, covert research "is inherently unethical". Of course it isn't. There are ways of managing it that can minimise potential harm. The point about ethical review is to debate openly the costs and benefits of conducting research dependent on both the topic and the technique. Ethical scrutiny will continue to grow. Social scientists need to be involved with it and should not assume that responsibility for our research conduct needs no oversight.

Ron Iphofen
University of Wales, Bangor

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments