English saviours and pseuds 2

June 28, 2002

If "lit critters" really want to "sell" themselves, they should write comprehensible English.

Even though I have a PhD in literature, I am baffled by the labyrinthine syntax and jargon-ridden prose of many literary theorists. What is one to make of such statements as "phallic law is used within film studies to deconstruct cinematic apparatus", or references to "the essential essence" and "the feminological intersubjective space that oscillates between one-ness and otherness" in recent texts?

Until theorists learn to write English, their only hope of appearing in the mainstream press will be in Private Eye 's "Pseud's Corner".

M. Wood
London W1

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments