Do v-cs deserve a PM's salary? 1

February 14, 2003

Andrew Oswald relates vice-chancellors' pay (Soapbox, THES , February 7) to that of chief executives in business and industry, where rates can be as high as £500,000 to £1 million a year.

Most people regard such salaries as grossly inflated. The term "industry fat cat" springs to mind.

Universities, however, are not-for-profit organisations, so why compare them to the commercial sector?

A more reasonable comparison might be the prime minister's salary, which is about £172,000 a year, only some £40,000 more than the average v-c's pay cheque. There cannot be many tougher jobs in the non-commercial sector than the prime minister's. Surely no v-c's work and remit exceed that of the government.

Oswald's argument is predicated on acceptance of commercial executives' salaries as reasonable. But to extend that to public-sector salaries would bankrupt the nation.

I suppose we should be grateful that the v-cs displayed continence in limiting their pay rises to an average 6.1 per cent.

Gary F. Baxter
London N4

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments