Different corners

May 8, 2014

Robert Gellately’s review of Richard Evans’ Altered Pasts: Counterfactuals in History (Books, March) suggests that the author’s critique of the “what if” genre throws the baby out with the bathwater. I agree, but for more substantive reasons than that advanced.

Even though it is true that much counterfactual history has methodological limitations – because it has depended on “facts which never existed” and implausible questions and answers, has ripped human actors from their broader social context, and/or involved the advance of politically influenced preferred alternative options – this does not necessarily invalidate a methodological form of inquiry that recognises the value of conceiving of ways in which the actual course of past events might have unfolded rather differently if actors had acted and organised themselves differently, armed with a different set of capacities and ideas, even if their exact effect cannot be predicted.

Arguably the posing of what could be more appropriately termed alterfactual courses of action in historical analysis is perfectly legitimate so long as the following methodological preconditions are applied:

(a) only those alternative courses of action are considered that were theoretically or practically considered at the time by actors and for which there is some historical empirical evidence are valid

(b) there is appropriate recognition of the complex dynamic interplay between (subjective) individual choices and (objective) historical material conditions

(c) any historical inquiry into what might have happened can be shown to be directly related to providing a more comprehensive understanding and explanation of what actually happened.

On this alterfactual basis it becomes possible for historians to not merely examine choices and events that happened and ask “why?”, but also to look at alternative choices and events that did not happen and ask “why not?”

Ralph Darlington
Professor of employment relations
University of Salford

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns