Different corners

May 8, 2014

Robert Gellately’s review of Richard Evans’ Altered Pasts: Counterfactuals in History (Books, March) suggests that the author’s critique of the “what if” genre throws the baby out with the bathwater. I agree, but for more substantive reasons than that advanced.

Even though it is true that much counterfactual history has methodological limitations – because it has depended on “facts which never existed” and implausible questions and answers, has ripped human actors from their broader social context, and/or involved the advance of politically influenced preferred alternative options – this does not necessarily invalidate a methodological form of inquiry that recognises the value of conceiving of ways in which the actual course of past events might have unfolded rather differently if actors had acted and organised themselves differently, armed with a different set of capacities and ideas, even if their exact effect cannot be predicted.

Arguably the posing of what could be more appropriately termed alterfactual courses of action in historical analysis is perfectly legitimate so long as the following methodological preconditions are applied:

(a) only those alternative courses of action are considered that were theoretically or practically considered at the time by actors and for which there is some historical empirical evidence are valid

(b) there is appropriate recognition of the complex dynamic interplay between (subjective) individual choices and (objective) historical material conditions

(c) any historical inquiry into what might have happened can be shown to be directly related to providing a more comprehensive understanding and explanation of what actually happened.

On this alterfactual basis it becomes possible for historians to not merely examine choices and events that happened and ask “why?”, but also to look at alternative choices and events that did not happen and ask “why not?”

Ralph Darlington
Professor of employment relations
University of Salford

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride