Committee commended

August 4, 2011

The British Sociological Association (BSA) and the Council of Heads and Professors of Sociology welcome the Commons Science and Technology Committee's report on peer review.

We are pleased that it endorses the strengths of peer review in ensuring the quality of research and scholarship, and that it recognises that it takes place in a wider context of review and assessment that includes the review of research proposals and pre- and post-publication review. We welcome the idea that new technologies and new social media facilitate innovative practices of review, but that these should be thought of as complementary to, rather than replacements for, the main features of the current system.

We also welcome the recommendation that there should be training in undertaking peer review for PhD students and early- career researchers. For its part, the BSA provides training for new reviewers for its own journals. We endorse the committee's concern that journal impact factors should not be used as proxies for quality in the assessment of research excellence.

Finally, we strongly endorse the committee's concerns about the absence of a regulatory body to ensure research integrity, and we believe this is not a matter that should be left as the sole responsibility of employers because of the possible conflict between transparency and "corporate" interests.

Judith Burnett, chair, Council of the British Sociological Association; John Holmwood, chair, Council of Heads and Professors of Sociology

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan