Clip Swan's wings

September 8, 2011

Upon opening last week's copy of Times Higher Education, I flicked to the Letters pages eager to read the undoubted responses to the plethora of articles on equality and diversity in the 25 August issue. Imagine my surprise to find that the magazine did nothing more than give the Athena Scientific Women's Academic Network (Swan) further free advertising ("Rewarding equality", 1 September).

Some preliminary research reveals no independent evaluation of the difference Athena Swan has made to women in science, technology, engineering and maths/medicine. I'm happy to be proved wrong, but I could find nothing. Case studies posted on its website appear to show good practice already under way to obtain the award rather than as a direct result of it.

I applaud the "celebration" of good practice but am disturbed by the increasing importance attached to an award of (as yet) unproven efficacy to the issue it is trying to address. That the Department of Health would restrict its funding based on such an award beggars belief.

The decision made by the department might be irreversible, but could I ask THE to stop giving free advertising to the organisation?

Alison Hay, Glasgow

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Technical Officer (Paramedic)

Staffordshire University

Professor in Marketing

Henley Business School

Lecturer or Senior Lecturer in Social Work

University Of The West Of Scotland

Research Service Manager

London School Of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (lshtm)
See all jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way