Class equality

May 21, 2004

As the principal author of the new government social class schema, I take exception to the cavalier criticisms of it by Richard Austen-Baker and Christopher Knight (Letters, May 7 and May 14).

The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification was the product of a seven-year programme of research and consultation. Knight asserts that members of the Academy of Social Sciences and the British Sociological Association would find the new classification risible. In fact, the team that produced and evaluated it included fellows and members of both as well as four fellows of the British Academy. It has been positively received in the UK and overseas.

There is nothing "new Labour" about the classification, either - work began under the previous Conservative government. And, contrary to the original report in The Times Higher , schoolteachers, librarians and social workers are in class 2, not class 1.

As for Austen-Baker's comments, the classification is not ordinal, as he - and Knight - assumes, but nominal. Class 4 is not therefore "lower" than classes 1 to 3, but different from them and from classes 5 to 8. Nor is it a measure of income, but of the typical employment relations and conditions of occupations. Hence, people in the same occupation might be in any number of classes depending on whether they were employers, managers, self-employed or employees.

In any case, there are not, as Austen-Baker states, "many" electricians and plumbers on £50,000 a year: the full-time average annual earnings for plumbers are £23,715 and for electricians £24,854 against an average for men in all occupations of £28,065. Male teachers and lecturers have average earnings far higher then electricians and plumbers and between £1,000 and £12,000 a year higher than the national average. Or does Austen-Baker have access to a better source of data than the New Earnings Survey 2003 ? The Daily Mail or The Sun perhaps?

David Rose
University of Essex

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns