Cheat challenge

February 23, 2007

Sunny Bains's way forward in dealing with plagiarism cases offers a new slant on handling such offences (Opinion, February 16).

However, I find it a trifle naive that an academic department should decide on new punishments without first obtaining clearance from college authorities or at least checking whether the new punitive/lenient measures fall within existing guidelines - which far from "vague and open to interpretation" seem fairly straightforward. Surely to do otherwise, in an increasingly litigious age, is inviting challenge?

Paul Shanley.
Institute of Education.
University of London

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Senior Lecturer in Law

University Of The West Of England (uwe)

Lecturer in Marketing

Edinburgh Napier University

Resource Planner

Bpp University

Waste and Recycling/Grounds Operative

St Marys University, Twickenham

Faculty, English

Khalifa University