Can't access all areas

December 24, 2004

Surely the future of Aimhigher - designed to widen access to higher education - is threatened by a lack of clear measures for its £300 million investment? There are some worrying signs that the Government's cash might be misdirected at best, or simply unmeasured at worst.

For example, the recent report from the Sutton Trust, which indicated that 3,000 academically qualified state-school students are failing to be admitted to top universities in favour of independent-school pupils, raises a question mark over the success of recent "inclusion" initiatives.

While I firmly support the purpose and objectives of Aimhigher, my concern is about its ability to succeed without a clear set of concrete measures.

Work with major UK universities leads me to believe that many local educational managers are simply unaware of the measures of success for such significant levels of investment.

This suggests that the measures either are being poorly communicated and measured against or simply fail to exist.

The first possibility is a major concern; the second needs urgent correction, particularly if Aimhigher is to prove its value when it is reviewed in 2006.

How could a government of any political persuasion back the extension of Aimhigher past 2006 without the evidence to warrant such a decision?

David Roberts
Managing director, LG01 Limited

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

SETsquared Centre Director

University Of Bristol

Lecturer in Maritime Law, Teaching only

Liverpool John Moores University

AcoRD Officer

University Of Leeds

Marketing and Communication Manager

Heriot-watt University