Candid Cantor

March 31, 2011

We should be grateful to Brian Cantor, chair of the Employers Pensions Forum, for coming clean about two things that we always suspected but our employers had previously denied ("In this climate, USS plans are generous", Letters, 17 March).

First, he admits "the need to bring final-salary provision to an end" - that is for all staff, not just new starters as the present pension reform proposals state. In other words, if we concede on the existing plans, the employers will be back for more.

Second, he admits that the proposed changes are not about shoring up the Universities Superannuation Scheme, because, as the current triennial revaluation will shortly confirm, the USS is remarkably healthy. Rather, they are about dealing with "the deteriorating financial environment that universities now face". The employers intend to rob their staff's contracted deferred pay to reduce university operating deficits.

Daniel Vulliamy, Senior lecturer in industrial relations, Centre for Lifelong Learning, University of Hull

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October