It is hard to understand what Paul Benneworth thinks a functioning higher education market should look like ("Higher fees could be the undoing of England's universities", 2 September). He clearly sees it as a problem if different fees are charged for different sorts of course, as he thinks this will reduce student demand. But he is in favour of fees at their present undifferentiated level, apparently forgetting that when they were introduced in 2006, a reduction in student demand was predicted.
Instead, at the last count, there were some 150,000 applicants still looking for a place this autumn. Would some of them have been willing to pay a higher fee to get a place? We don't know. What we can be fairly certain of is that the cosy universities cartel that Benneworth proposes, even if it got past the regulators, would not be in the best interests of students, taxpayers or universities.
Paul Temple, Co-director, Centre for Higher Education Studies, Institute of Education, University of London.
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now