Beggaring belief

April 10, 2008

So now Universities Secretary John Denham wants us to recreate 19th-century levels of educational philanthropy and civic engagement by asking the taxpayer to stump up £200 million to match alumni and charitable donations. This from a minister who claims he can no longer justify half that amount a year to fund tens of thousands of second-chance, mostly part-time adult learners, with the result that these ELQ (equivalent or lower qualifications) students - who are, by definition, alumni - are told they are no longer welcome in our universities, and providers that have done more than anyone else to deliver the civic engagement of their universities are closing down.

Rightly keen to maximise their income, vice-chancellors are unlikely to cavil at the further irony that that the very ministers who exhort universities to behave like businesses and treat our students as customers now ask us to be as unbusinesslike as possible by holding out the begging bowl.

In the real world, businesses such as Marks & Spencer would be laughed off the high street if they asked customers for charitable donations to meet shareholders' targets. Fortunately, as the select committee inquiry into ELQs has found, Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills policy is unconstrained by the limited imaginations to be found in the real world.

After all, M&S hasn't even worked out that it makes brilliant business sense to charge returning customers - loyal alumni every one of them - three times the prices they paid the first time they walked in the store.

Ian Ground, Centre for Lifelong Learning University of Sunderland.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

Lecturer in Marketing

Edinburgh Napier University

Faculty, English

Khalifa University

Junior Research Fellow for the Research Project

Vellore Institute Of Technology

Knowledge Exchange Manager, Innovate

Royal Holloway, University Of London