BA answers and more questions 1

September 12, 2003

"Minister to reply to MP's letter" might be thought a more accurate if less colourful headline to your report ("Ministers to probe BA's 'old-boy bias'", THES, August 22), especially given the comment at its end by a Department for Education and Skills spokeswoman.

Since March, Richard Grove has made increasingly strident accusations about the failure of the British Academy to adopt his proposal as a centenary research project. There are constraints in replying because of our rule of not commenting on individual grant applications, but your report makes four charges that need to be answered.

The first is that a key criterion for the award was changed after applications were invited. It was not. All applications were considered and assessed in relation to the same criteria, which were published at the outset.

Second, BA fellows are said to have had access to competitors' proposals.

Fellows, who are part of the academy's governance, could have known the titles of applications but no more. It is difficult to see what significant advantage could be derived.

Third, complaints are made by Grove that an assessor had a conflict of interest. As you prudently note, they are strongly denied by the scholar in question.

As to the fourth charge, if Grove truly supposes that the academy, by drawing his attention to alternative sources of funding, is trying to buy him off, he is seriously in error. All research funds are awarded in open competition.

It is regrettable that he continues to denigrate the successful project, which is an exciting and path-breaking interdisciplinary venture of the very highest academic quality.

P. W. H. Brown
Secretary, British Academy

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns