Arts and impact: with friends like these (1 of 4)

November 18, 2010

The humanities may yet survive, if only they can be protected from their current advocates. The articles by Judy Simons and Rick Rylance ("REF pilot: humanities impact is evident and can be measured" and "The art of staying hopeful", 11 November) betray the very cause they are defending.

The defence of the humanities within a business model predicated on consumer choice fosters in its advocates the most conceited form of 19th-century historicism and the most craven version of 19th-century utilitarianism. It implies that great works and ideas that have been part of received culture for centuries only now, in the current conservative dispensation of the first decade of the 21st century, can be made to reveal their true raison d'être: their social-commercial value (by implication, their ultimate worth).

It needs to be stated emphatically: there is nothing in this "defence" of the humanities that really addresses their actual, current crisis, and nothing that is "humanistic" at all.

Martin L. Davies, Reader, School of Historical Studies, University of Leicester.

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments