Art not academe, again

February 2, 2012

The touchingly recurrent motif of a university core executive afflicted by incipient narcolepsy informs Peter Hill's assessment of the divergent purposes of the art school and the university ("The art of the matter", 19 January).

In 1976, my first-year fine art tutor at what was then Leeds Polytechnic, Ken Rowat, published an article in The Guardian that patiently argued against the blandishments of academic respectability in the visual arts, which he saw exhibited in students opting for BA awards over the diploma in art and design. He additionally saw this attitude manifest among the heads of polytechnic art departments themselves, rather than their directors (although those with art training could prove "particularly dangerous"). Rowat's polemic culminated in his 1979 piece "The student artist as an academic outcast", which further condemned giving credence to the accommodations of scholarship.

Hill's narrative might therefore be not so much a "superfiction" as a retelling of the same story, with the subsuming entity replaced by the university. It is presumably known to your readers that in the early 1970s Joseph Beuys was sacked as professor of monumental sculpture at the Arts Academy of Dusseldorf and only reinstated after a legal battle lasting six years, despite Beuys being the sun around which a constellation of artists matured.

References to "theory", whether ill-fitting or not, bring to mind Sir William Coldstream's committee and its 1970 model of complementary studies teamed with a history of the practice, with an emphasis on the priority of the practice itself. If universities have failed to appreciate the academic coherence of Coldstream's quadripartite matrix of art and design studies and its inherent critical tensions, then my own experience as a lecturer holding to that medial role created by the higher award that is Coldstream's legacy can perhaps be offered.

In a teaching career that extends over 20 years, I have enjoyed only one permanently contracted post. When the redundancy selection process visited the choice between academics who were engaged by the university and those non-practitioners who came with the art school it had "hoovered up", who do you think kept their jobs?

Michael Marshall, London

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy