An unsure vet

March 20, 2008

The possibility of universities "capping" or otherwise restricting - "vetting", "pre-selecting" - grant applications is clearly now on the horizon ("REF may lead to restrictions on grant applications", 13 March). I wonder, though, if all the implications of this have been thought through.

In the first place, how many universities genuinely have the expertise (ie, duplication of top-class staff) to be able to do it properly? Career pro vice-chancellors are not likely to be up to the task across the range of disciplines or at the level of specialist knowledge required, so who will do the vetting?

Second, in the case of, say, a scientist (so far it is mainly scientists, but that may change) whose research, career and employability are entirely dependent on securing funding, if a university committee declines to allow an application to go forward, does that not open the door to legal action?

Third, if promotions are related to the capturing of grants (and they already are), will there not be a flood of appeals against both the refusals of university committees and the subsequent rejection of promotion applications?

Finally: do universities actually have the legal authority to debar staff from making applications? There will certainly be academic freedom issues somewhere along the line, too. Fun and games ahead, then.

David Trotter, Professor of French, Department of European languages, Aberystwyth University.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns