An artless critique

January 27, 2006

I always thought that the point of reviews was to enter into a critical dialogue with the work under scrutiny. This is not the case with Winston Fletcher's lambasting of my book Art and Advertising ("Artful dodgy theory", January 20).

I am at a loss as to why a man of Fletcher's stature would prefer to give me a thrashing and be prepared to make wild accusations about my lack of subject knowledge and to skew the evidence to do this.

Contrary to Fletcher's claim, the book is neither imbalanced nor partisan and it wouldn't take a particularly close look at it to confirm this.

To counter another criticism, yes, I have selected key campaigns to support my arguments, on the justifiable basis of the demonstrable purchase that they have made on the culture and the connections that can be drawn with contemporary art practice. To address the totality of advertising as, Fletcher suggests, would have been inappropriate and unworkable.

Fletcher also claims the book is lacking in historical content. This is emphatically not due to a lack of historical knowledge on my part. The point of the book is to trace a complex set of interrelationships between two arenas of contemporary practice, and while there are several relevant historical trajectories in it (including one going back to the late 19th century artist/poster-makers that Fletcher claims I know nothing of), to have rehearsed the history of advertising and the poster, let alone the history of advertising and the literary arts, would not only have been beyond the scope of the book but would also have been at odds with the discursive approach that I have taken.

Joan Gibbons University of Central England

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns