The arrival of the third Education Secretary of this Parliament, joining the third Higher Education Minister in the same period, is a reminder of what rare stability universities and colleges saw under the first Blair administration. For both David Blunkett and the then Tessa Blackstone to remain in the same posts for an entire Parliament was a feat that may never be equalled. Since 2001, by contrast, normal service has resumed: less than a year after the previous Education Secretary and Higher Education Minister, Charles Clarke and Alan Johnson, piloted the most contentious piece of legislation higher education ever produced through the Commons, both have moved on to bigger (if not necessarily better) things.
Of course, it is consistency of approach, rather than office holders, that those in higher education value. There is no reason to think that Ruth Kelly would wish to undo Mr Clarke's reforms, even if she could. But constant changes of leadership are bound to be unsettling. Ms Kelly may turn out to be a long-term appointment but, with an election months away, there can be no certainty, even in the event of another Labour victory.
Higher education's lobbyists will want to make an early impression on issues such as the relationship between teaching and research... just in case.
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Sign in now