From where I sit - Doctorates for everyone

March 31, 2011

Question: When is a doctorate not a doctorate? Answer: When it's a master's degree.

So here's the thing: government education ministers in Australia are seriously considering a proposal to award certain master's degrees that would entitle the holder to use the title "doctor of...".

Eh? Run that by me again? It's the doctorate you have when you don't have a doctorate, is it? But if you want a doctorate, shouldn't you, um, do a doctorate? Just saying...

Yes, it might sound elitist to reserve the title of "Dr" for those who have actually done a PhD or a professional doctorate, but I'm in accord with Susan Greenfield, the UK science communicator and researcher, on elitism in universities: it has its place.

So, the new "extended master's" degrees, such as juris doctor of law and doctor of health, will "sit within the master's level of the AQF (Australian Qualifications Framework)", according to the Higher Education supplement in The Australian newspaper earlier this month.

But surely if they are at the doctoral level, they should be part of doctoral programmes, not master's? If they're not at the doctoral level, they should be called master's degrees. Or is that too obvious? How is it possible for a doctor of medicine qualification to be a master's degree? It's confusing, baffling and just plain silly.

I smell a rat. Knowing today's university culture, I'm sure it has something to do with funding. Is this to attract more students, to justify shortened courses and thus turn them around more quickly? Or could it be to provide ever-cheaper labour in the form of poorly paid (or even unpaid) research assistants?

Call me old school, but I believe in the tradition of the doctorate, awarded since the Middle Ages but in its modern form since the early 19th century. As an article in The Economist last December put it: "It is an introduction to the world of independent research - a kind of intellectual masterpiece, created by an apprentice in close collaboration with a supervisor."

I smile wryly to see that the title of that article is: "The disposable academic: Why doing a PhD is often a waste of time".

A PhD is supposed to foster the highest levels of thought and research and the outcome is that new material is added to world knowledge. Such lofty ideals are being whittled away, surely and not so slowly, in a world that values profit, greed and quick fixes above all else.

In addition, this latest miscategorisation seems to be part of a more general trend to demote university qualifications. It's common in Australia for short vocational courses that offer certificates or diplomas, for example, to be popularly referred to as "degrees". The term "degree" seems to have become synonymous with any sort of post-school training.

Soon, school-leaving certificates will be referred to as degrees. But let's not stop there.

Has your child finished infant school? She could well be awarded a bachelor's of childish studies. She can then proceed to a master's in middle-school studies and on to a doctorate in school-leaving studies.

Then again, the new "extended master's" degrees are mostly for those in health and medical fields, many of whom, with only undergraduate degrees, are referred to as "Dr" anyway.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show