Welcome fee policy

October 6, 2000

I was delighted that you gave such prominence to Baroness Blackstone's reply to my question on differential fees at the fringe meeting organised by the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals during the Labour Party conference ("Blackstone rules out top-up fees", THES, September 29).

Her unequivocal statement of government opposition to differential fees was warmly welcomed by those at the meeting and will reassure many others inside and outside the Labour Party.

Top-up fees would clearly undermine the government's commitment to widening access and, as Lady Blackstone pointed out, would be deeply unpopular with large numbers of'middle-income families. Perhaps those "policy advisers" who have been encouraging the idea will now start promoting government policy, rather than seeking to undermine it.

Paul Blomfield Chair, Sheffield Labour Party

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October