University strike over pay to hit exam season

Two-day strike over 'insulting' 1.1 per cent pay rise offer may affect student exams and marking

May 9, 2016
'Do not enter. Exam in progress' sign on staircase
Source: Alamy
You shall not pass: May’s strike is likely to affect student exams and marking

Student exams are likely to be disrupted after the University and College Union announced that its members will stage a two-day walkout over pay later this month.

Lecturers and other higher education staff will hold a two-day strike on 25 and 26 May in protest at the offer of a 1.1 per cent pay increase for 2016-17, the UCU announced on 9 May.

Further strike days may also be held in June and July if employers do not improve their current pay offer, said the union, which is also asking staff not to undertake overtime or voluntary duties under a “work to contract” action starting on 25 May.

The union is also considering whether to take action in August to coincide with A-level results day and university clearing.

The decision to hold the two-day walkout – which will fall in the middle of most universities' exam seasons – was taken by the UCU’s national representatives on 6 May after 65.4 per cent of those voting in a ballot backed strike action.

Some 77.3 per cent also voted for action short of a strike in the ballot, where turnout was 35.5 per cent.

It followed what the UCU called a “marginally improved” offer – via the Universities and Colleges Employers Association – of a 1.1 per cent pay increase for 2016-17, up from 1 per cent.

The union had originally called for a 5 per cent increase.

Sally Hunt, the UCU general secretary, described the 0.1 percentage point increase as an “insult”, saying that “employers need to come back to the table with a much improved offer if they wish to avoid significant disruption to students in the coming months”.

“Industrial action that impacts on students is never taken lightly, but staff feel that they have been left with no alternative,” said Ms Hunt.

“Members in higher education have sent a clear message to employers that, after six years of real-terms pay cuts amounting to 14.5 per cent, they will not tolerate a continued squeeze on their income,” she added.

An improved offer is “clearly affordable” given the total surpluses of £1.85 billion posted by the sector in 2014-15, the union has said.

However, Ucea has argued that the final pay offer amounts to an average sector increase of 2.7 per cent once progression pay was included, and was “at the absolute limit of affordability and the very best that will be available”.

A Ucea spokesman said that “the vast majority of staff in higher education institutions understand the reality of the current [funding] environment and do not support action that could harm both their institutions and their students”.

“Ucea and higher education institutions are dismayed that the UCU has targeted students from the very outset of pay discussions,” he added, saying that “one trade union [was] on a path to try and cause disruption”.

While the industrial action was “entirely lawful”, universities would have “no choice but to deduct full pay from any member of staff taking strike action”, Ucea added.


Print headline: Strike over pay to hit exam time

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论

Reader's comments (3)

A two-day walkout, while welcome, is a paltry action in the face of employer intransigence. Not only will this serve to save employers two days of salary without substantially harming their operations, but it will not provide sufficient pressure to cause them to make meaningful concessions to UCU demands. In the short run, while a longer walkout would be difficult for students, the achievements that it will bring for staff will enable them to perform better and to thereby better serve student needs going forward. Students should demonstrate solidarity with staff by joining them on the picket lines. A strike action should be maintained until and unless UCEA comes back with a truly acceptable offer e.g. 5% or more of a pay increase.
It is quite natural that the union should fight for better pay, but let's not forget that the universities do not print money. A decade of significant growth in junior academic salaries ended 5-6 years ago, but the recovery in the job market has been slow. Exorbitant pay rises such as 5% would further restrict availability of lecturer-level posts, hence the ability of universities in this country to attract fresh talent. Hopefully the UCU understand this and are prepared to moderate their demands.
Once upon a time I was on a final-salary pension scheme and could afford to be patient. Now that I've been forced onto an average-salary pension scheme, I've got to fight for fair, cost-of-living increases each and every year. You reap what you sow, chaps.


Log in or register to post comments