China’s ‘paper factories’ lack innovation, says Tsinghua provost

Bin Yang tells THE summit that Chinese universities lack ‘original, innovative ideas’

April 3, 2019
Bin Yang
Bin Yang

Chinese universities risk becoming mere article production factories that churn out papers lacking in original, innovative ideas, a provost at one of the nation’s leading institutions has suggested.

Bin Yang, provost and vice-president at Tsinghua University, told the Times Higher Education Innovation and Impact Summit that there was a perception that some Chinese universities had made great progress in research, but he said that the “picture was not always so rosy” and that the country’s universities still faced many “quality-related issues”.

During his keynote address, Professor Yang spoke about some of the key innovators of the 19th and early to mid-20th centuries, including the physicist Robert Noyce and the computer scientist John McCarthy, before adding: “What do they have in common? None of them are Chinese.”

He acknowledged that China has “played a catch-up role” since then and was looking to make a substantial contribution to the fourth industrial revolution, but said that even just a decade or so ago, China’s internet giants were “simply applying existing ideas in the US to the Chinese market and were not demonstrating original innovation…until recent years”.

“What keeps Chinese university presidents awake? The lack of original, innovative ideas in papers that will take universities and the country forward. That’s the big concern,” he said.

“In an age of innovation, the goal is not to become a journal paper factory.”

Professor Yang cited several “obstacles” that hindered innovation in China at a time when the relevance of research to society was being widely questioned. These included academics’ focus on “safe” research topics and universities’ emphasis on publication output in their evaluation of researchers, the high proportion of ageing scholars and a lack of “research team members”.

The last was fuelled by a “PI or nothing” attitude among many Chinese academics, who have a preference for principal investigator positions at “low-level universities” over researcher positions at top institutions, he said.

However, Professor Yang said that a new policy at some universities forcing academics to retire at the age of 70, despite having the potential to lead to a “shock drop in the number of academics, might not be bad news for innovation and early career researchers”.

After his speech, Professor Yang was asked whether China’s national excellence initiatives, and the incentives that they offered, should be blamed for universities becoming publication factories.

He replied that the policies were “very efficient and productive” and that research quantity was an important base for the drive to increase quality.

But in the future, he continued, universities should work more closely with their local and provincial governments, industry and global partners so as not to “fall in another trap” by receiving money only from the central government.

ellie.bothwell@timeshighereducation.com

后记

Print headline: Tsinghua provost: ‘paper factories’ thin on ideas

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October