Talks dangle bonus for good teaching

四月 17, 1998

EXCELLENT teaching in universities is to receive its reward under a key funding council strategy discussed this week.

Talks will take place over the next few months on how to allocate money to promote the best in higher education teaching and research, while keeping bureaucracy to a minimum.

The proposals, discussed at the Higher Education Funding Council for England's annual conference, are broad-ranging and still at an early stage.

Any policy finally agreed is expected to evolve gradually, drawing on new methods of assessing quality as they develop.

Methods suggested so far include: * A teaching quality premium included in core teaching funds, which would reward institutions proved to be good at teaching.

* Linking cash to institutions' learning and teaching strategies. More and more institutions have developed such strategies since Dearing.

* Allowing institutions that can prove excellent teaching to take on more students. HEFCE has already funded places for about 8,500 extra students this year in institutions with some proof of high-quality teaching. In future, colleges and universities that can prove quality could be offered a choice of extra grant or extra student numbers.

* Money could be allocated according to the proportion of accredited teaching staff as a way of encouraging institutions to develop accreditation schemes and boosting the proposed Institute for Learning and Teaching.

* Extending the existing Fund for the Development of Teaching and Learning. This already allocates Pounds 14 million to 63 projects showing high-quality teaching. The funding council could give extra money to successful projects funded either by this scheme or by the Teaching and Learning Technology Programme.

* Using wider ranging evidence of quality, including audits, to measure excellence in different aspects of teaching and learning.

The funding council favours basing judgements of teaching quality on the existing teaching quality assessment system.

But this has recently changed and is due to change again in 2001, which means any system of rewarding quality will need to develop over time.

Initial response from vice-chancellors showed broad support for the principles behind the scheme but disagreement over suggested methods for implementing it.

Some were cautious about relying on accreditation schemes that had not yet been developed.

Others questioned the value of rewarding institutions which already performed well rather than helping those which were dragging behind.

There were also reservations about basing teaching assessments on criteria that were too broad and a fear of further audits.

Please login or register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments