Secrets of gut microbiota may lead to a new understanding of disease

October 22, 2002

Brussels, 21 Oct 2002

The ageing process has many effects on the human body, but the change in composition of our intestinal flora is one of the more mysterious, and is the focus of a Commission funded project called Crownalife.

The three year study will examine and characterise the millions of mostly beneficial bacteria present in our digestive systems, then develop nutritional strategies for maintaining a healthy and balanced microbiota, particularly for the elderly.

The project's preliminary findings show that whilst almost 70 per cent of the microbes present in the guts of infants can be identified, in elderly people that figure drops to only eight per cent, and the number of different species is up to ten times higher. Researchers feel that this may play a role in the development of diseases, and hope that they can develop functional foods based on study of these unknown bacteria that will deliver significant health benefits.

The Crownalife project will receive 1.82 million euro in Commission funding under the quality of life section of the Fifth Framework Programme, and includes partners from Italy, France, Sweden, Belgium, Germany and the United Kingdom. The group will conduct studies in several different parts of Europe in order to find out whether there are any geographical trends to the types of microbes present in the gut.

The key development that led to the creation of the project was the improvement in analysis tools that enable the mapping of unknown areas of the body. The team will now apply these tools to define strategies to promote and maintain a balanced, beneficial microbiota.

For further information, please consult the following web address: http://www.crownalife.be

CORDIS RTD-NEWS/© European Communities, 2001

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October