Performance rises at colleges

October 8, 1999

Colleges are stemming the flow of drop-outs and are helping more students to gain qualifications, according to figures from the Further Education Funding Council.

The FEFC's performance indicators, revealing levels of retention and achievement in all colleges, show that the proportion of students successfully completing college courses has risen for the third year, to 75 per cent for 1997-98. Student retention has stayed at 87 per cent for full-time students.

Although the average student achievement rate has risen by 6 per cent since 1995-96 - and is up 2 per cent over last year - the proportion of students successfully gaining qualifications still varies widely between colleges.

On some longer courses, especially where student "deprivation" was high, failure rates reached 33 per cent. But at some colleges with relatively low student deprivation - including Melton Mowbray, Oaklands and Stanmore colleges - failure rates topped 50 per cent. The FEFC said that the colleges with the worst achievement rates were generally improving.

Sixth-form colleges are far more successful in getting students through exams. In 1997-98, the average achievement rate in sixth-form colleges was 85 per cent, compared with 70 per cent in general further education colleges.

Across the sector, average retention rates have barely changed in the past three years, although drop-outs among full-time students are higher in general further education colleges than in specialist and sixth-form colleges.

David Melville, FEFC chief executive, said: "This data shows that FE is taking major steps forward in raising its standards of education and training." He said the indicators were vital. "Colleges can measure their improvement by using these indicators as a starting point," he said.

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October