Let the law decide

十一月 5, 1999

I have often told the MP who is representing the case for a fair student appeal system that for this government to ask the Quality Assurance Agency to administer complaints-appeals procedures is like asking company quality controllers to run trading standards. They have different functions and interests.

The QAA is too easily influenced by the Committee of Vice-chancellors and Principals to design a fair complaints procedure.

To suggest that a member of the governing body is "independent" is naive: that university dealings with appeals should be "timely" without specifying is negligent; and that "informal resolution should be an option" is wilful stupidity.

I recently resolved one problem with a university in one month by force of law; I should have been able to resolve my case for a student appeal by force of law nine years ago. Students now vote and pay fees. So in the 21st century, give students cheap, quick access to the law through a modified small-claims style court.

Chris Floyd


登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments