"I/A" Item Note: Adoption of a Council Decision Concerning the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (link)

March 5, 2004

Brussels, 04 Mar 2004

Full text of Document 5870/04
Suite of documents 5870/04

No. Cion prop.: 13692/03
Subject: Adoption of a Council Decision concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
COMMON GUIDELINES
Consultation deadline: 10.2.2004

1. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (hereinafter the International Treaty) was adopted on 3 November 2001 by the FAO at its 31st Ministerial Conference.

On 6 June 2002 the Community and its Member States signed the International Treaty.

2. The proposal for a Council Decision concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community and its Member States, of the International Treaty was submitted to the Council on 15 October 2003.

3. The European Parliament delivered its opinion on 29 January 2004.

5870/04 CHS/pch 2

4. The Coordination Working Party (FAO) found an agreement on an amended text as well as on a draft statement for the Council minutes at its meeting on 12 January 2004..

5. It is suggested, therefore, that the Permanent Representatives Committee confirm the agreement reached within the Working Party and recommend that the Council

- adopt, as an "A" item, the Decision as finalised by the legal/linguistic experts and set out in doc. 13735/03 ,

- enter in the minutes of the Council the statement set out in the Annex.

[...]

[Public Info Net automatically generates links to Council Register documents when an appropriately formatted document number is given. However, the document may not be available for public use and/or it may not be loaded on the Council Register yet.]

Council Register

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October