Ethics debate kicks off over World Cup ball

July 7, 2006

The World Cup football, hailed by manufacturers Adidas for its accuracy and criticised by detractors for its tendency to "veer off path", is at the centre of a debate about research ethics, writes Phil Baty.

The ball, to be used in Sunday's World Cup final in Berlin, has been the subject of research at Loughborough University. It might have been hoped that the results would settle, once and for all, arguments about the ball.

But sadly not. The university has refused to answer a single question on this study - including queries about its conclusions, publication plans and sponsorship arrangements - as it is all "confidential".

A Freedom of Information request by The Times Higher found that a study, "Player perception testing of 2006 World Cup ball", led by Loughborough's Roy Jones, head of the sports technology research group, was given ethical clearance in February 2005.

Documents reveal that the university's ethical advisory committee raised concerns and demanded clarification of the application's "sponsorship arrangements".

The researchers had stated that the project was not sponsored but that it was "covered by the sponsor's insurance". The ethics committee noted that "one of the investigators was undertaking the research for Adidas".

When The Times Higher asked Professor Jones to clarify sponsorship arrangements and a publication date, he said: "We have been involved with Adidas in the development of the World Cup ball, but the information is confidential."

Asked if the contract with Adidas meant that he was unable to answer the questions, including those relating to assurances given to the ethics committee, Professor Jones said simply, "yes".

Gill Evans, a Cambridge University professor, who campaigns on issues of academic freedom, said universities had a duty to ensure research integrity in contracts with commercial funders. "It should also ensure that no conflict of interest exists that can potentially undermine the perceived independence of the results," she said.

 

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October