Cambridge students angered by v-c’s rejection of concerns over fees vote

Students at the University of Cambridge have reacted with anger after the vice-chancellor blocked an attempt by about 150 academics to change the terms of a vote over whether to allow the institution to set tuition fees at £9,000 a year.

March 9, 2011

Two amendments that would have forced the university to explain its fees decision in more detail – and to guarantee the existing level of bursaries for poor students – were signed by dozens of academics.

However, Sir Leszek Borysiewicz, Cambridge’s vice-chancellor, rejected both as “inadmissible” because they would delay the university’s submission of an agreement to the Office for Fair Access. He added that a decision on bursaries was still to be considered.

Rahul Mansigani, president of the Cambridge University Students’ Union, said: “We are appalled and outraged by the decision of the university to blatantly refuse to acknowledge the concerns of its students and academics.”

A series of counter-motions – known as “graces” – signed by academics could still be voted on if the university’s council allows them to be put to Regent House, which will vote in the main ballot over the next few weeks.

simon.baker@tsleducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October