Attempts to 'gag and silence' academics are commonplace

Marina Warner explains why she chose to speak about her departure from the University of Essex

九月 11, 2014

There is “a tremendous atmosphere of gagging and silencing” in UK universities that prevents academics from speaking out when they feel that they have been treated unfairly.

This is according to Marina Warner, until recently professor of literature, film and theatre studies at the University of Essex. She left her post after 10 years at the university and, rather than stay quiet, publicly documented the reasons for her departure in an article for the London Review of Books.

Her criticism relates to the way in which the university is managed, which Professor Warner claims has resulted in scholars being pushed to complete an unmanageable list of activities in the pursuit of “prestige, publicity, glory, impact”; a shift of emphasis from research to teaching in order to attract lucrative overseas students; and a leadership team that enforced top-down change in a manner that, she said, often showed no regard for the opinions of academic staff.

At one point, she compares UK higher education more generally to the world of Chinese communist corporatism, “where enforcers rush to carry out the latest orders from their chiefs in an ecstasy of obedience to ideological principles which they do not seem to have examined, let alone discussed with the people they order to follow them”.

Speaking to Times Higher Education, Professor Warner said she feared that “a culture of obedience and deference” was taking hold within universities.

“People used to appreciate independent-mindedness and freedom of speech and advocacy of ideas,” she said. “People at large still value that, I think, and some parts of the world are in flames because of it.”

However, it was increasingly difficult for academics to criticise their institutions, she said, even after they leave their post, because of gagging orders put in place to prevent them from speaking openly.

“You have to decide, as I did, to break all connections [with the university],” she said – adding that this was something she was fortunately able to do because of her career outside academia.

“I was in a lucky position and I wanted to use my lucky position,” she said of the decision to go on record with her experience. “I can’t tell you how many letters I’ve had [since the LRB article was published] – an avalanche.”

One such letter asked: “If they can do this to you with your reputation, what will they do to postdocs just starting out?”

There could have been “an element of pour encourager les autres” about her treatment by Essex, she said, adding that the university’s refusal to compromise for a long-standing and prestigious academic such as her might mean that others would “come in line because they will be frightened”. She said she hoped that writing her account would help to raise awareness of the changes that are taking place in UK universities.

“In this new system…the chain of command leads to administrators,” she said. “Academics are subjugated to the managers.”

Essex’s vice-chancellor, Anthony Forster, who comes in for particular criticism in the LRB article, declined an invitation to speak to THE. But in a statement the university said: “Students are our priority and we are committed to delivering a transformational educational experience, where students are taught by the leading thinkers in their field and have the opportunity to undertake research. Excellence in education and research are our two priorities and they enjoy equal esteem.”

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial



  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

Thank you, Marina.
Thank you very much for your article, Prof Warner. I could not agree more with Marina Warner's assessment of the situation and would like to thank everybody for the article who contributed to it. I used to work at the University of Essex as a part-time teacher on fixed-term contracts and just won an automatically unfair dismissal case against the University. The Judge declared that my dismissal was automatically unfair, as the reason for it was the fact that I submitted a claim for permanency. The University did not carry out any procedure and did not inform me about any right regarding dismissal. They did not even answer my email in which I was enquiring about the reason for my dismissal. A bit over a week before the expiry of my contract I just noticed that my photo had disappeared from the departmental photo board. This was the way in which the Department said good-bye to me and expressed their acknowledgement of my over 5 years continuous employment. The whole situation was quite absurd, I really had not come across people like this before. So a great thank you Prof. Marina Warner and everyone who is brave enough to take a stance and raise their voices against this bullying behaviour which goes against fundamental moral values. And this behaviour goes not only against fundamental moral values, but as it has been proven, also against the UK law. I think challenging by law what these people are doing can be an effective tool in the fight. As arrogance is often combined with ignorance in their behaviour, which exposes them. In my employment tribunal case the most clear evidence for my automatically unfair dismissal - besides several pieces of circumstantial evidence - was an email regarding me by an HR Officer to the Head of my Department, which read as follows: "X is pursuing her case for permanent employment... Was the intention that she would teach modules again next academic year? I would advise against this if possible as ongoing teaching of modules each academic year can lead to claims for permanent employment." This email was also included in the hearing bundle.