American website gets hammered for online college auction

October 22, 1999

BOSTON American universities are balking at a new website that lets students and their families "bid" on-line to find a university willing to enrol them at fees they determine in much the way consumers bid online for airline tickets.

Students do not learn the identity of the university they might attend unless their bid is accepted, and they may decline with no further obligation.

The educational consultant behind the idea called the criticism hypocritical, saying Amer-

ican universities commonly negotiate for students by discounting their tuition fees to fill classes or attract top scholars or athletes.

The free site, eCollegebid.org allows families to specify what they are willing to pay, along with the student's grades and area of study. Participating universities then review the offers.

The universities pay a flat annual fee. About a dozen have signed up so far and more are expected to join. The service will not say which ones, though it concedes that none is a big name.

"They are mostly private colleges that are not household names and do not often make the rankings found in the popular media," the company said.

"They are, however, colleges that offer challenging academic programmes of study, excellent athletic programmes and active student and social activities."

The National Association of College Admissions Counselers has started an investigation into whether universities that sign up for eCollegebid.org violate the organisation's ethical principles by giving students only 30 days to accept an offer, or by failing to disclose the true full price.

But founder Tedd Kelly, a former university admissions officer, said his site gives students the power they deserve as consumers as well as streamlining admissions and recruiting pro-

cesses.

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October