A shake-up too far

四月 17, 1998

Your description of the proposed Institute for Learning and Teaching is a depressing read (THES, April 10). Far from being a "radical shake-up", it looks like the old formula of using a solution to define a problem.

Thus the institute will "use the outcomes of research to stimulate innovative teaching". What do those words mean? Innovation that has to be stimulated sounds about as convincing as spontaneity that has to be organised.

And the "research" itself? Will it be allowed the possibility of discovering that different students at different times in different subjects with different teachers benefit from different approaches? Or that "good practice" depends on the values of the interpreter? I suspect not. Instead, we shall find that those whose values are to be implemented will be setting the context of the so-called research.

For teachers the message is: classroom teaching will be rewarded with mere associate membership; those who teach how to teach will be grandee fellows.

Michael Harry. Louth, Lincs

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多