Two-way street

十二月 10, 2015

Public engagement in the UK is stuck in the doldrums and fails to recognise that the world’s most intractable problems can be tackled only by building collaborations between people with different perspectives (“Scholars on the public stage deserve a hand”, Leader; “Public engagement: go forth and mingle”, Features, 3 December). Public engagement by UK researchers often merely involves the dissemination of “facts” by experts to passive recipients, rather than risk a questioning of the authority of the expert. Immunising the Mind, published by the British Council last month, links this uncritical approach in UK science education to the rise of fundamentalism.

The full potential of research will be unleashed only when higher education institutions recognise that everyone, from whatever background, is capable of contributing insights towards the production, application and questioning of knowledge. For inspiration, we should look to countries such as the US and Canada, where such approaches as public science, participatory action research and community-based research have survived the teething stage, reached the White House and are now inspiring a new generation. We have launched People’s Knowledge to bring together researchers and communities who wish to engage in this more sophisticated sense.

Colin Anderson and Tom Wakeford
People’s Knowledge
Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com

Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday. View terms and conditions.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.