The measure of trust

January 5, 2007

It will need more than watchfulness to ensure that the central purpose of university life remains intact ("Academe's value must be upheld", Leader, December 15).

Neither "modernisation" nor "accountability" per se are threats to the academy.

The real threats are the unaccountability of the old-fashioned managerialist manipulators and the acquiescence of the creatures they appoint to serve them.

The answer is equally old-fashioned - not pro vice-chancellors, but a dose of democracy to make those at the top of the ladder truly accountable to those at the bottom.

Figuring out what you have to do to persuade people to trust you with their votes is a discipline second to none. How many of our academic "leaders" could master it?

P. K. Burgess

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October