Sceptic thanks

五月 6, 2005

Anthony Pagden's discussion of "Big Questions in History" (Features, April 29) opens with a quotation from Richard Rorty. An omission in his account is any mention of his late emeritus colleague Richard Popkin. For it was Popkin's The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Descartes that first demonstrated the impact of scepticism in the early modern period, thereby revolutionising our understanding of the intellectual history of the time. Moreover, by showing the impact of scepticism in religious disputes, Popkin showed that its role in demolishing old certainties went far beyond philosophy. Whether Popkin would have accepted Pagden's straightforwardly secularising account of the Enlightenment is doubtful. Sadly, his death on April 14 means that is a debate for others to pursue.

Sarah Hutton
Professor of early modern studies, Middlesex University

Please Login or Register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
Register