Scare tactics

June 6, 2013

I was disappointed by the lack of challenge in “State of independence could prove costly, Scots warned” (News, 23 May). In Scotland, we are being bombarded relentlessly with scare stories about independence. Some raise reasonable concerns, despite the manner in which they are presented, and merit serious responses. Others are just silly.

While your report is in the former category, two questions might have been raised. First, why would a future Scottish government, fully committed to higher education, mindful of the importance of research and with the resources to support it, not want to do so? Second, does anyone seriously think that research funding from the UK government will not be subject to further threats as the coalition pursues its fiscal policies and looks for more cuts? The article might also have mentioned access to European Union funding following the proposed “in/out” referendum.

We live with uncertain futures, no matter the result in September 2014.

Bryan D. MacGregor
University of Aberdeen

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October