Postgrad pluses

三月 2, 2007

Your article "QAA pans uneven postgrad support" (February 16) on the Quality Assurance Agency's review of research degree programmes (RDPs) presented a selective and unrepresentative picture of the findings.

Launching its report on the review at the winter meeting of the UK Council for Graduate Education, the QAA said the overwhelming message was positive and was particularly good in transferable skills development. The conference welcomed the snapshot of work to embed the QAA code of practice on RDPs in the sector.

It is unfortunate that your readers were not given the balanced view of developments that the report portrays. Such skewed reporting serves the sector badly in giving an unjustifiably negative message to our political masters and to prospective research students.

Malcolm McCrae
UK Council for Graduate Education

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多