Not radical or rational 1

April 23, 2009

John Milbank is quoted as saying that "by supporting the total disjuncture of sex and procreation, the Left is really supporting a new mode of fascism" ("Lazarus-style comeback", 16 April).

Two things are very clear about this statement. First, the learned professor might spend a little more time learning about fascism in practice, rather than invoking it merely as a label for something he dislikes (the counterpart being "radical", which surfer-style seems to predicate anything he agrees with). He might then be a bit less casual in his use of language. Second, since it is very hard to see how any evidence or rational argument could support the assertion, it would be very nice to know how he arrived at it.

I am not sure which is more outrageous: making this assertion in the first place or publishing it without challenge.

Richard Ashcroft, Professor of bioethics Queen Mary, University of London.

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October